In the ever-changing landscape of the financial markets, the Federal Reserve may halt interest rate cuts, and there are even rumors of triggering a "36 trillion dollar great retreat," which instantly ignites the nerves of global investors. This is not just a problem for the U.S. economy, but also a significant test for the stability of the global market. Can we really find a way to survive and develop in such a situation?

Currently, inflationary pressures are intensifying, and the adjustment of the Federal Reserve's monetary policy will undoubtedly have a profound impact on the future economy. The possibility of stopping interest rate cuts makes investors uneasy, with concerns about liquidity contraction following closely, and the potential risks of market volatility are continuously accumulating. Just imagine, if the Federal Reserve's policy really triggers this "deep-water bomb," will the global financial market fall into turmoil again?

The Evolution and Impact of the Federal Reserve's Monetary Policy

Since the pandemic, the Federal Reserve's monetary policy has undergone a transformation from extreme easing to potential tightening. In 2020, to cope with the economic impact brought by the pandemic, the Federal Reserve reduced the benchmark interest rate to near-zero levels and launched a large-scale quantitative easing policy to support economic recovery.

This round of operations not only injected unprecedented liquidity and drove the rise of the stock market, but also led to soaring asset prices and a market boom that was unparalleled at the time. Over time, inflationary pressures have gradually emerged, forcing the Federal Reserve's monetary policy to face a change.

Advertisement

Data shows that the U.S. inflation rate exceeded 7% in 2023, especially against the backdrop of rising food and energy prices, which significantly increased the cost of living for the public and changed societal expectations. All of this has made the adjustment of the Federal Reserve's monetary policy more urgent. In such a severe economic situation, stopping interest rate cuts has become an inevitable choice.

Some experts point out that maintaining an easy policy could lead to further uncontrollable inflation, damaging the foundation of economic recovery. History has taught us that excessive liquidity often leads to asset price bubbles, and once the bubbles burst, the market will face catastrophic consequences. For example, the "taper tantrum" event in 2013 reminds us that liquidity tightening could trigger severe market fluctuations.According to the latest data, the Federal Reserve's balance sheet has surpassed $9 trillion in 2020, and with the initiation of the asset reduction plan, the tight situation of market liquidity will become increasingly apparent. If the easing continues, it will not only fail to effectively curb inflation but may also lead to global economic instability.

On the other hand, stopping interest rate cuts may lead to an increase in market financing costs,加重企业和个人的负担, which also makes the market feel uneasy about the future economic outlook. For many businesses that rely on low interest rates, the rise in borrowing costs will undoubtedly hit their profitability and investment willingness, and may even trigger a "stagflation" situation. More importantly, the financial market's sensitivity to Federal Reserve policy makes the talk of stopping interest rate cuts a trigger for market fluctuations.

As the Federal Reserve's policy gradually tightens, investors' emotions also begin to fluctuate. Many people are thinking: how should we deal with this situation? In the face of uncertainty, maintaining a calm and rational attitude is particularly important.

The rumors of "36 trillion big retreat" and market reactions have attracted widespread attention from the market. This rumor mainly refers to the Federal Reserve's reduction of huge funds on the balance sheet, which may lead to a sudden reduction in market liquidity. After this news came out, many investors began to re-examine their asset allocation, and some institutions even began to lay out in advance to prepare for possible market fluctuations.

According to historical data, liquidity tightening often leads to violent market fluctuations. For example, the "taper tantrum" incident in 2013 was precisely due to the Federal Reserve's announcement of reducing bond purchases, leading to the spread of panic in the market. Therefore, after learning that the Federal Reserve may reduce its balance sheet, investors can't help but feel fear. If this huge amount of funds really exits the market, how will the market react?

The market's reaction to the Federal Reserve's reduction of the balance sheet is not uniform. On the one hand, many analysts believe that the reduction helps to recycle excess liquidity, thereby reducing systemic financial risks. This view has been supported by many institutional investors, who believe that moderate liquidity tightening is conducive to the healthy development of the market.On the other hand, there are concerns that such operations could trigger capital flight, exacerbate market panic, and affect the stability of the global financial market. Especially under the current complex and changeable international situation, any uncertain factors could trigger larger-scale market fluctuations. This makes the "36 trillion dollar retreat" a focus of market investors.

Market, investors, and the general public's response strategies

In the face of changes in Federal Reserve policy, the market, institutional investors, and the general public all need to reassess risks and adopt appropriate response strategies. Recent data shows that the demand for safe-haven assets such as gold has increased, indicating investors' concerns about future market uncertainty.

In the fixed-income market, bond interest rates are gradually rising, indicating the market's expectation of higher future interest rates. Many institutional investors have begun to reallocate assets, increasing their investment in safe-haven assets such as gold, while avoiding over-reliance on stock market gains. This shift is not only to avoid risks but also to find new opportunities in uncertainty.

For ordinary investors, it is crucial to enhance financial knowledge, diversify investments reasonably, and avoid "all-in" investment decisions. Faced with the dual pressures of high inflation and economic recovery, the general public needs to consider the impact of interest rate changes on personal finances more cautiously when making major purchases such as buying a house or a car.

At the same time, the general public must also pay attention to policy changes and economic data, and adjust their consumption and investment strategies in a timely manner. In this complex financial environment, rational decision-making will be an important guarantee against risks.

Conclusion

In summary, the Federal Reserve's monetary policy not only concerns the US economy but also profoundly affects the stability of the global financial market. The cessation of interest rate cuts and the possible "36 trillion dollar retreat" make investors face greater uncertainty and challenges in the future. In the face of such market turmoil, are we ready for the potential market storm?